at://bnewbold.net/app.bsky.feed.post/3lskyifxg3s2p

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2025-06-27T06:16:01.746Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreietzlzif7vhconqtbloruj3itnu67f6uth66qgxtczqvm7lzdybxi",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:mn45tewwnse5btfftvd3powc/app.bsky.feed.post/3lskvdxaa622k"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreihj3gmhfnzqqt2ealaouw3eg4jll5eexojlfduqer37jjcvjpyqsa",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:mn45tewwnse5btfftvd3powc/app.bsky.feed.post/3lskuf5yx4k2k"
    }
  },
  "text": "if we were really clever, we would come up with some way of encoding the target of a graph-relation record (eg, \"like\" and \"repost\") in the rkey. eg, a hash of the target URI.\n\nthen you could do single-record lookups; and would prevent double-like.\n\n(tho maybe maybe double-repost is desirable 🤔)"
}