at://bnewbold.net/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhvllgutl22t

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-03-25T17:13:26.035Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreidvrkn7nmeqsw6ar6w6g3qxzdnibdzcep25bmqkrq2kgbmxwpumku",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:5w4eqcxzw5jv5qfnmzxcakfy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhuwpyvzuc2f"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreigcgnaiqphl2hfgn74wvibyo3q6dpetbhdpecu6e2ljadeqdoajmy",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:5w4eqcxzw5jv5qfnmzxcakfy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhtyzwzvh22j"
    }
  },
  "text": "my gut reaction is what would be a big protocol expansion to effectively require PDS instances to do access tokens in a specific way, and we don't want to do that. eg, if PDS implementations want to use a simple UUID for the token that is fine."
}