at://bnewbold.net/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhvlqhrkec2t

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-03-25T17:16:14.749Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreigjrmub2vgjddxrafuzgbk3sajpa5lxpx5lf2fsbf7btnfkoc7iam",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhvllgutl22t"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreigcgnaiqphl2hfgn74wvibyo3q6dpetbhdpecu6e2ljadeqdoajmy",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:5w4eqcxzw5jv5qfnmzxcakfy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhtyzwzvh22j"
    }
  },
  "text": "I think the spec is trying to be clear on this (it's opaque!), but can update to remove the mention of JWTs all together in that context if it helps.\n\nan earlier example was folks trying to parse JWTs for the 'exp' field and implementing refresh logic that way, which IMO is brittle and impl-specific"
}