at://bnewbold.net/app.bsky.feed.post/3mwciqdt6ak2f

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-09-25T00:19:48.770Z",
  "facets": [
    {
      "$type": "app.bsky.richtext.facet",
      "features": [
        {
          "$type": "app.bsky.richtext.facet#mention",
          "did": "did:plc:yk4dd2qkboz2yv6tpubpc6co"
        }
      ],
      "index": {
        "byteEnd": 33,
        "byteStart": 23
      }
    }
  ],
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreidg6ajftggbmczfvq5yeaenoq5imvziejv6vctggg3dtc4lt7ihp4",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:hdhoaan3xa3jiuq4fg4mefid/app.bsky.feed.post/3mwc5n4f4gk24"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreidg6ajftggbmczfvq5yeaenoq5imvziejv6vctggg3dtc4lt7ihp4",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:hdhoaan3xa3jiuq4fg4mefid/app.bsky.feed.post/3mwc5n4f4gk24"
    }
  },
  "text": "some notes parallel to @dholms.at:\n\nI'm confused why the commitment (integrity?) hash would not go in the header CBOR.\n\nI like having magic! and it being extensible. combining the \"type\" and \"version\" together in a single byte might work?"
}