at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3kmyenxhwbs22

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2024-03-06T00:00:48.022Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreid46cg5fivctyqnbk5mzdvycmvdnosdobgprf226dichvm6arfjpy",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:oio4hkxaop4ao4wz2pp3f4cr/app.bsky.feed.post/3kmyeczzdj42j"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreiawccqqfn2octugkue4f3fphrglxla4i7aajlabehgzxic3uf4vre",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:mlnlfhnoo2sl5c7pjk6qmy35/app.bsky.feed.post/3kmyc4sdkl22j"
    }
  },
  "text": "(this is non-binding / non-official)\n\nIETF is probably going to want us to build on formal IETF standards, which includes CBOR but not (currently) IPLD. will IPLD or dag-cbor become an IETF standard around the same time? or will atproto spec reference CBOR directly, with restrictions? time will tell"
}