at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3kn223ry4lc2v

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2024-03-06T15:57:00.993Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreibqth2mbd3pok2ns23blj35cnw6osvmk2ibbqqztwj6d4jtrnhwsm",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:izttpdp3l6vss5crelt5kcux/app.bsky.feed.post/3kmzyv2ykvl2e"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreiawccqqfn2octugkue4f3fphrglxla4i7aajlabehgzxic3uf4vre",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:mlnlfhnoo2sl5c7pjk6qmy35/app.bsky.feed.post/3kmyc4sdkl22j"
    }
  },
  "text": "IETF has deterministic CBOR work going on right now, but sadly not compatible with dag-cbor normalization rules. OTOH the dag-cbor rules mostly match a section of core CBOR RFC, so it isn't whole cloth or anything.\n\ndef a blog post needed here to lay out the details/situation"
}