at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3l5zfq2qhgk25

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2024-10-08T18:01:09.169Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreify26alr3coi3ootjzoxpyobv66hwswx6vkdttov5lt5lvl62jym4",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3l5zfm7dzjj2u"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreihudob22xr2d3i34zqcialqm6kihptjzxucd3ib5bz6uzninbugey",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:ad5bwszsc5m5jpj2sfa6uzjk/app.bsky.feed.post/3l5zaz3k7sm24"
    }
  },
  "text": "it sounds like what you are proposing is \"did:plc but operated by somebody else\", which isn't really a new method. our design goal with did:plc was to have \"who is operating it\" not really matter: either because the operator has no power over the DIDs, or a consortia, or good governance"
}