at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3lbeav5m7uc2s

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2024-11-20T05:49:23.292Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreiev7jr53hozcrdb3lwwd5tqxtwz7aj7ivr7ywskqeowgxsm2qzhqy",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:ia76kvnndjutgedggx2ibrem/app.bsky.feed.post/3lbe3vrk622bp"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreihawfqr6avze6n4zjra3fq7gtz2ropi2i4dhqzwntkf52zvqvhy74",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:ia76kvnndjutgedggx2ibrem/app.bsky.feed.post/3lbe2lwgvsk4d"
    }
  },
  "text": "great questions!\n\nactual CIDs are still pretty locked down in syntax and hash type.\n\nthose test cases are specifically for validating CID strings in Lexicon validation. we would like Lexicon validation to be flexible..."
}