at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3m2dllu2ihc2p

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2025-10-04T02:58:13.401Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreicle3ipc6bju6g2lqqk323rtswm7pdn3evicgtickieldes5ed6da",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3m2dlkeuws22p"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreied34ebezbwoftlomgnatv4ip5cpsdoel4nocjdvjbti33otesnna",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:fpruhuo22xkm5o7ttr2ktxdo/app.bsky.feed.post/3m2aexhm7z22x"
    }
  },
  "text": "social graph updates: who is responsible for re-writing records? how does that software become aware? client apps mostly don't \"see\" DID documents in AT\n\ncontent references, like reply threads: doing updates breaks content-addressed \"strong\" references, which cascade recursively"
}