at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3m2kqcqnlc22w

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2025-10-06T23:11:14.720Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreierfzczajvzvlxsk4xujgi7tgoxctdyozt4rnqf533zjszflksoam",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:hdhoaan3xa3jiuq4fg4mefid/app.bsky.feed.post/3m2kq4f4zwc2d"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreiaeh7ziz5rd5i2iqxgrto7skcnorot4eodo3nixbyfp4ajfysev6i",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:hdhoaan3xa3jiuq4fg4mefid/app.bsky.feed.post/3m2kpafwmes2r"
    }
  },
  "text": "I think you had an identitcal/different rkey typo, but yeah you can have two identical records with different rkeys.\n\nin that case I think under sync 1.1 we'd want the record included twice in the CAR file? the intent is to be able to \"scan\" the CAR/tree w/o maintaining state"
}