at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3m7q7qtgcz22u

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2025-12-11T18:36:50.347Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreihmlv5cstmhftyfusr75qk5fa6yotorlddtxiicjo4cmzhcfol35a",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:w4xbfzo7kqfes5zb7r6qv3rw/app.bsky.feed.post/3m7q77og3g224"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreifwebmixx3xstbk3av5qtvomrp26hp45zzhxqd3qwiecegg34cpvi",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:w4xbfzo7kqfes5zb7r6qv3rw/app.bsky.feed.post/3m7q72pytls24"
    }
  },
  "text": "I think group DIDs are the right way forward.\n\nI think design patterns around this would help, both UX and DX, so that mechanics are minimized, but the power dynamics are legible.\n\neg, UX and communication around what rotation keys end up in group DID (assuming it is a PLC DID)"
}