at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mcxtcrua5c2u

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-01-21T23:31:06.833Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreihqr4z2siytw3or75wx725j4y25audccjg3ea6v3zzfi4hfe3fqky",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mcxtabeais2u"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreiffoqccbngrbigvwnlnd6wgx35dagxumlyamjx4iaanfe3a4ru6di",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:5w4eqcxzw5jv5qfnmzxcakfy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mcxpak5zfc2m"
    }
  },
  "text": "I think the current setup isn't the best from a user perspective.\n\nbut I do think that indexing software should be resilient to handling inactive accounts during backfill, and even a relatively large fraction of backfill accounts being inactive (eg, 1% to 10% of accounts being deleted/takendown)"
}