at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mf767gwewk2d

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-02-19T08:25:07.291Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreidxjuaszchgvj4gv2thbfjxdl2oswofjffr5uv4snz5qz5ohtmhxy",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mf763p2um22d"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreia74ruqycbq4y57k4vshwb3nlucnnqp7a2ff66rll3q7fapy66kvm",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:cbkjy5n7bk3ax2wplmtjofq2/app.bsky.feed.post/3mf5wucfpw225"
    }
  },
  "text": "in some sense having \"permitted identities\" (other users) represented as an ACL directly in the protocol is sort of optional. you might want to leave that to application layer; like \"folks I follow can read this\". those relationships are in app-defined and app-specific schemas, not protocol-level"
}