at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mp34apwy7k2t

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-06-24T23:51:20.142Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreigvhu7pbcxkkmur4elg2rzmc7kyc6gk6rusj6xnah5wduomdrwcgu",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mp345qbnd22t"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreiajqjhmvatzwbuh4p5g6cbxul4jpen62fowbvbeo3fo6stgjemyb4",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:5w4eqcxzw5jv5qfnmzxcakfy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mp2iyo7vms2c"
    }
  },
  "text": "also a bit ambiguous about subscribeLabels emitting labels for multiple labeler DIDs. would be nice for multi-tenancy and label relay use cases, but if consumers accept all valid signed labels naively, a malicious labeler could replay random signed labels from any other authority, which feels bad"
}