at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mph54w2bpk2v

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-06-29T18:39:02.927Z",
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreifoth26jzu673xwpdrj6gjhkgcasmoqglm6ozvkqvdf2by3qwveti",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mph4zasbb22v"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreig5jimo5i5hoz3r34rpq76hzreqav4jmn5i3jookd2pxoxrumpcny",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:thaoj4hhvraos7y6v3yog7re/app.bsky.feed.post/3mpdmn73lps2g"
    }
  },
  "text": "we could in theory take PLC and add alternative identifier syntax and resolution mechanisms, using the same identifiers (eg, the hash part after 'did:plc:').\n\nbut i'm not really sure what that would win us.\n\nthere is a ton of deployed code using DIDs today"
}