at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mppgu2adhk2k

Back to Collection

Record JSON

{
  "$type": "app.bsky.feed.post",
  "createdAt": "2026-07-03T01:54:20.655Z",
  "facets": [
    {
      "features": [
        {
          "$type": "app.bsky.richtext.facet#link",
          "uri": "https://standard.site"
        }
      ],
      "index": {
        "byteEnd": 253,
        "byteStart": 240
      }
    }
  ],
  "langs": [
    "en"
  ],
  "reply": {
    "parent": {
      "cid": "bafyreifhfhrir6yne5s7a3usbrzejynn2yhxgen5wbjworh65ra452m3ku",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:44ybard66vv44zksje25o7dz/app.bsky.feed.post/3mppgqbeuoc2k"
    },
    "root": {
      "cid": "bafyreibfcstd3xlttaa23isnfpav57c55yskauqi2i2v7bgnfponih2hga",
      "uri": "at://did:plc:43l77wm7hyxizh4atc2gnrnt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mppepadcjs2i"
    }
  },
  "text": "I think interop across similar lexicons is a strength of atproto and i'm glad to see it demonstrated.\n\nI think it would be neat if lexicon schemas could implement interfaces (or do mixins, etc). eg, the blogging lexicons could \"satisfy the standard.site contract\" instead of needing extra records..."
}